R3 · Street and curb

Street, curb and boarding interface.

How will people reach, wait for and board the vehicle?

Research release BTC-RESEARCH-2026-10-17.1 · Prepared 17 October 2026 · Project applicability unresolved

Proposed decision guidance for architects and the customers who commission their projects. Site experiments remain unexecuted.

All twelve decisions ↗

The architect’s task.

Map the continuous approach and actual boarding space; compare existing access with separable loading changes.

The commissioning customer’s responsibility.

Fund assistance and the management of the curb, with agreed outcomes for riders and people passing by.

RESEARCH FINDING

What the evidence supports.

Interaction studies, prototypes, curb observations and historical incidents inform the questions. They do not set local geometry or boarding times.

The connection from a study to this decision is an analyst interpretation. Study conditions, methods, funding and limitations are available in the approved research library.

COUNTEREVIDENCE & DISCONFIRMATION

What could change the decision.

Equivalent conventional/shared arrangements complete the brief with lower full burden, or the new layout creates unacceptable obstruction/exclusion.

This is a contrary case to test. The linked claim cards distinguish observed contrary findings from proposed project tests.

REMAINING QUESTIONS

What the project still needs to establish.

  • Actual vehicle geometry and user devices; local demand and crossing behavior; ownership and adopted access requirements.

Before making the commitment

Actual fleet geometry, user/device tasks, local demand/dwell distributions, crossing behavior and required professional review.

FOLLOW THE CONNECTION

Research, clauses and project facts.

DecisionResearch claimRelevant clauseExact source location

A relevant clause may depend on jurisdiction, service type, funding, adopted edition and the work being proposed. A research finding does not establish legal applicability.

The approved library shows examined provisions and analyst connections separately from standards records that have only been screened as candidates.

Trace the evidence for R3 ↗

How this page fits the research.

Possibility Atlas references: AU02, AU05, AU09. Synthesis themes: I01, I02, I03, I04, I05, I07.

These identifiers connect the desk research. They do not indicate field validation, an agreed project brief or a compliance determination. This web guidance does not revise the existing book editions.