FROM THE REGION TO THE FRONT DOOR

Twelve decisions.
Shared responsibilities.

What can the architect prepare? What must the customer define, fund and accept? Begin with the decision, then follow the evidence and the questions it leaves open.

Research release BTC-RESEARCH-2026-10-17.1 · Prepared 17 October 2026 · Project applicability unresolved

These are proposed decision guides. Each links research, contrary cases and remaining questions; actual project experiments have yet to be agreed and carried out.

Open the research library ↗ Check a small trial ↗

12 of 12 decisions

R1 · Region and development

Location, density and access to opportunity

Models and a short study using human chauffeurs examine demand responses. They do not forecast local land use.

Explore this decision

R2 · District land and parking

Net land release and district parking

Facility and network models, with curb observations, identify possible effects. Net district or regional land savings remain unestimated.

Explore this decision

R3 · Street and curb

Street, curb and boarding interface

Interaction studies, prototypes, curb observations and historical incidents inform the questions. They do not set local geometry or boarding times.

Explore this decision

R4 · Public realm and whole journey

Whole journey through the public realm

Selected surveys, prototypes and service plans inform the journey. An inclusive comparison of completed journeys remains absent.

Explore this decision

R5 · Campus and site

Campus arrangement and building relationships

Campus records, operator accounts and service plans describe arrangements. They do not establish which layout performs better under the same brief.

Explore this decision

R6 · Receiving and building program

Receiving and building program

A single-hospital goods-workflow study observes actual tasks. It does not establish local area or net labor savings.

Explore this decision

R7 · Building circulation

Doors, lifts and building circulation

A single-hospital goods-workflow study and a historical interface specification describe door and lift tasks. They do not establish capacity, shaft requirements or investment value for another building.

Explore this decision

R8 · Structure and adaptation

Parking adaptation and future use

An applied retrofit study identifies barriers, and a model examines conditional parking expansion. Neither prices a local change of use or demonstrates a realized return.

Explore this decision

R9 · Energy and service infrastructure

Energy and service infrastructure

Models examine duty cycles, resources and vehicle lifecycle effects. Local energy, simultaneous power demand and utility capacity remain unestablished.

Explore this decision

R10 · Operations and labor

Human work and ordinary operations

Observed planned human tasks, guidance and scenarios show work that must be considered. They do not supply a transferable staffing ratio.

Explore this decision

R11 · Governance and continuity

Change authority and continuity

Historical provider and agency corrective cases, with institutional plans, identify responsibility questions. No current site and provider agreement has been accepted here.

Explore this decision

R12 · Lifecycle environment and distribution

Lifecycle and distribution of benefits/burdens

The models have explicit comparison and lifecycle limits. Integrated regional carbon effects and local distribution of burdens remain unestimated.

Explore this decision

People, place, planet and technology enter the same brief. Jurisdiction, operating model, adopted requirements and acceptance criteria must be established for the actual project. Research connections are not a certification of compliance.